eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
Original paper

The relationship between advanced lung cancer inflammation index and high SYNTAX score in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Ali Hakan Konuş
1
,
Ahmet Özderya
1
,
Ömer Faruk Çırakoğlu
1
,
Muhammet Raşit Sayın
1
,
Murat Gökhan Yerlikaya
1

  1. University of Health Sciences, Trabzon Ahi Evren Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
Adv Interv Cardiol
Online publish date: 2024/08/13
Article file
- the relationship (3).pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
 
 
1. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005; 1: 219-27.
2. Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 2389-97.
3. Garg S, Sarno G, Serruys PW, et al. Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 66-75.
4. Magro M, Nauta ST, Simsek C, et al. Usefulness of the SYNTAX score to predict “no reflow” in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 601-6.
5. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 115-26.
6. Jafri SH, Shi R, Mills G. Advance lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) at diagnosis is a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a retrospective review. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 158.
7. Tomita M, Ayabe T, Nakamura K. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is an independent prognostic factor after surgical resection in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 26: 288-92.
8. Park YH, Yi HG, Lee MH, et al. Prognostic value of the pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy. Acta Haematol 2017; 137: 76-85.
9. Feng JF, Huang Y, Chen QX. A new inflammation index is useful for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 2014; 7: 1811-5.
10. Jank BJ, Kadletz L, Schnöll J, et al. Prognostic value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276: 1487-92.
11. Shibutani M, Maeda K, Nagahara H, et al. The prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 241.
12. Maeda D, Kanzaki Y, Sakane K, et al. Prognostic impact of a novel index of nutrition and inflammation for patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Heart Vessels 2020; 35: 1201-8.
13. Wang X, Wei C, Fan W, et al. Advanced lung cancer inflammation index for predicting prognostic risk for patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Inflamm Res 2023; 16: 3631-41.
14. Guasti L, Dentali F, Castiglioni L, et al. Neutrophils and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or cardiac revascularisation. A systematic review on more than 34,000 subjects. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 591-9.
15. Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, et al. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 653-7.
16. Uthamalingam S, Patvardhan EA, Subramanian S, et al. Utility of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 433-8.
17. Oduncu V, Erkol A, Karabay CY, et al. The prognostic value of serum albumin levels on admission in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2013; 24: 88-94.
18. Kurtul A, Murat SN, Yarlioglues M, et al. Usefulness of serum albumin concentration to predict high coronary SYNTAX score and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Angiology 2016; 67: 34-40.
19. Parsa AF, Jahanshahi B. Is the relationship of body mass index to severity of coronary artery disease different from that of waist-to-hip ratio and severity of coronary artery disease? Paradoxical findings. Cardiovasc J Afr 2015; 26: 13-6.
20. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461-70.
21. Magro M, Räber L, Heg D, et al. The MI SYNTAX score for risk stratification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a substudy of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial. Int J Cardiol 2014; 175: 314-22.
22. Khalill R, Han L, Jing C, et al. The use of risk scores for stratification of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Exp Clin Cardiol 2009; 14: e25-30.
23. Capodanno D, Capranzano P, Di Salvo ME, et al. Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 731-8.
24. Kim YH, Park DW, Kim WJ, et al. Validation of SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score for prediction of outcomes after unprotected left main coronary revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 612-23.
25. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 272-7.
26. Drakopoulou M, Toutouzas K, Stefanadi E, et al. Association of inflammatory markers with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2009; 206: 335-9.
27. Sakai H, Tsutamoto T, Ishikawa C, et al. Direct comparison of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP secretion and extent of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J 2007; 71: 499-505.
28. Cariou B, Bonnevie L, Mayaudon H, et al. Angiographic characteristics of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients compared with matched non-diabetic subjects. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2000; 13: 134-41.
29. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Jaffe R, et al. Relation between obesity and severity of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1277-80.
30. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012; 32: 2045-51.
31. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK; Leducq Transatlantic Network on Atherothrombosis. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 2129-38.
32. Ridker PM. Residual inflammatory risk: addressing the obverse side of the atherosclerosis prevention coin. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 1720-2.
33. Döring Y, Drechsler M, Soehnlein O, et al. Neutrophils in atherosclerosis: from mice to man. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35: 288-95.
34. Fioranelli M, Bottaccioli AG, Bottaccioli F, et al. Stress and inflammation in coronary artery disease: a review psychoneuroendocrineimmunology-based. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 2031.
35. Montecucco F, Liberale L, Bonaventura A, et al. The role of inflammation in cardiovascular outcome. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2017; 19: 11.
36. Soria-Florido MT, Schröder H, Grau M, et al. High density lipoprotein functionality and cardiovascular events and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2020; 302: 36-42.
37. Horne BD, Anderson JL, John JM, et al. Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk? J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1638-43.
38. Núñez J, Miñana G, Bodí V, et al. Low lymphocyte count and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Med Chem 2011; 18: 3226-33.
39. Fernández-Ruiz I. Neutrophil-driven SMC death destabilizes atherosclerotic plaques. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019; 16: 455.
40. He J, Bian X, Song C, et al. High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with type 2 diabetes mellitus predicts poor prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a large-scale cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2022; 21: 156.
41. Hedrick CC. Lymphocytes in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35: 253-7.
42. Altun B, Turkon H, Tasolar H, et al. The relationship between high-sensitive troponin T, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and SYNTAX Score. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2014; 74: 108-15.
43. Don BR, Kaysen G. Serum albumin: relationship to inflammation and nutrition. Semin Dial 2004; 17: 432-7.
44. Eckel RH. Obesity and heart disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1997; 96: 3248-50.
45. Krauss RM, Winston M, Fletcher BJ, Grundy SM. Obesity: impact on cardiovascular disease. Circulation 1998; 98: 1472-6.
46. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, et al. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1983; 67: 968-77.
47. Özderya A, Tekbil M, Ertürk N, et al. Comparison of coronary artery lesion complexity and body component parameters measured by TANITA. Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20: 37-44.
Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.