eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


3/2023
vol. 22
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

The relation between serum uric acid and severity of preeclampsia in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study

Ihab I. Samaha
1
,
Ainur Donayeva
2
,
Ibrahim A. Abdelazim
3

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
  2. Department of Normal Physiology, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Menopause Rev 2023; 22(3): 130-134
Online publish date: 2023/09/22
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is a relatively common complication in pregnancy, affecting 2–10% of pregnant women [1, 2]. The incidence of PE is higher in Africa (1.3%) and developing countries than in developed countries (0.5% in Europe) [35], and it is the second leading cause of maternal mortality [5].

Preeclampsia is a disease of multiple theories, which include genetic, immunological, uterine vascular, and endothelial dysfunctions [6]. Endothelial inflammation and dysfunction are the main possible mechanisms of PE [6].

Renal perfusion and glomerular filtration are reduced in PE, which subsequently affect the excretion of the urea, creatinine, and uric acid [6].

There is no reliable screening test to diagnose PE [5]. The serum uric acid (SUA) is one of the most sensitive indicators of the severity of PE, and a significant positive relations was observed between the SUA and severity of the hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and maternal outcome [7].

The high SUA in severe PE is associated with an increased risk of complications, i.e. hepatic dysfunction, and it could be a helpful marker for the severity of PE [8].

A large, controlled study and meta-analysis reported a positive linear association between the SUA and PE [9], and Roberts et al. found that high SUA was associated with adverse neonatal outcome including, lower birth weight, preterm deliveries, and small-for-gestational-age infants [10].

There are conflicting data regarding the relation between SUA and severity of PE, and a systematic review found that SUA was a poor predictor of maternal and foetal complications in severe PE [11]. Hence, this study designed to detect the relation between SUA and severity of PE.

Material and methods

A total of 110 women were included in this cross- sectional study, which was conducted over 2 years (2019–2020) after approval of the Maternity Hospital Ethical Committee (No. Obs_1208_19).

Participants were included in this cross-sectional study after informed consent following the Helsinki Declaration.

Inclusion criteria: pregnant women ≥ 20 years old, with mild PE, admitted in labour (mild-PE group) and pregnant women ≥ 20 years-old, with severe PE, admitted in labour or for induction of labour because of the severity of PE (severe-PE group).

ACOG defined PE as hypertension (HTN) and proteinuria after 20 weeks’ gestation without a previous history of HTN [12]. The proteinuria is ≥ 300 mg proteins/24-hr urine and/or protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio ≥ 0.3 [12].

The protein/creatinine ratio of 0.45 corresponds to 300 mg proteins/24-hr urine, while the P/C ratio of 0.9 corresponds to 1000 mg proteins/24-hr urine [13, 14].

The diagnosis of mild PE was based on blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mm Hg measured twice (≥ 4 hrs apart) after 20 weeks’ gestation without a previous history of hypertension, and proteinuria (P/C ratio ≥ 0.3) [12].

The diagnosis of severe PE was based on BP ≥ 160/ 110 mm Hg, after 20 weeks’ gestation without a previous history of hypertension, and proteinuria (P/C ratio ≥ 0.5) [12].

Women with chronic or gestational hypertension, superimposed PE, diabetes, urinary tract infection, or pre-existing chronic renal disease and those who refused to participate were excluded from this study.

Gestational hypertension is defined as HTN of new onset after 20 weeks’ gestation, without a previous history of hypertension, and/or proteinuria [15].

Chronic hypertension (CH) is defined as HTN diagnosed before pregnancy and persists postpartum [12, 16].

Superimposed PE is defined as HTN diagnosed before pregnancy and superimposed with proteinuria [15].

After a thorough history and clinical examination, renal function tests were done for participants according to the hospital’s protocol to exclude pre-existing chronic renal, followed by spot mid-stream urine samples to measure the P/C ratio [5].

The biuret colorimetric (Cobas Integra Analyzer, Switzerland) method was used to measure the urine proteins [16]. The modified Jaffe (Hitachi Autoanalyzer, Japan) test was used to measure the urine creatinine [13, 14]. The serum uric acid was measured by the enzymatic method. The collected participants’ data were statistically analysed, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to detect the relation between SUA and severity of PE.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated using G Power 3.1.9.7 software (Heinrich Heine Universität, Germany), setting the α-error at 0.05, power (1-β error probability) at 0.95%, effective sample size (w) at 0.5, and using the t-test for statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

The variables were analysed using the t-test (for quantitative variables) and the β2 test (for qualitative variables). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was also used to detect the relation between SUA and severity of PE. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Declaration of consent

The study was approved by the Maternity Hospital Ethical Committee (No. Obs_1208_19).

Participants were included in this cross-sectional study after informed consent following the Helsinki Declaration.

Results

A total of 110 pregnant women were studied; 55 wo-- men with mild PE (mild-PE group) were compared to 55 women with severe PE (severe-PE group) in this cross-sectional study to detect the relation between SUA and severity of PE.

Participants’ characteristics

There was no significant difference between the mild-PE group and the severe-PE group regarding the mean parity (1.49 ±1.16 vs. 0.71 ±1.02, respectively), (p = 0.1 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.8, 1.19]), gestational age at delivery (37.72 ±0.34 weeks vs. 34.8 ±1.50, respectively), (p = 1.0 [95% CI: 2.5, 2.9, 3.3]), and the number of women who had a previous history of PE (18.18% (10/55) vs. 21.82% (12/55), respectively), (p = 0.69) (Table 1).

Table 1

Characteristics, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and serum uric acid of the 2 studied groups

ParametersMild-PE group
(55 women)
Severe-PE group
(55 women)
p-value
(95% CI)
Maternal age (years)29.95 ±4.4727.42 ±5.350.01* (0.37, 0.8, 1.2)
Parity1.49 ±1.160.71 ±1.020.1 (0.37, 0.8, 1.19)
Body mass index [kg/m2]27.59 ±1.7929.36 ±1.330.01* (–2.37, –1.8, –1.2)
Previous history of PE, n (%)10 (18.18)12 (21.82)0.69
Gestational age at delivery (weeks)37.72 ±0.3434.8 ±1.501.0 (2.5, 2.9, 3.3)
Systolic blood pressure at delivery144.55 ±3.34176.82 ±2.590.03* (–33.4, –32.3, –31.1)
Diastolic blood pressure at delivery94.64 ±3.42116.18 ±2.690.04* (–20.7, –19.5, –18.4)
SUA [mg/dl]5.26 ±0.797.65 ±0.610.02* (–2.7, –2.4, –2.1)

CI – confidence interval, PE – preeclampsia, SUA – serum uric acid

χ2 test used for statistical analysis when data presented as number and %. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and number and percentage (%). t-test was used for statistical analysis when data presented as mean ± SD.

* Significant difference

The severe-PE group was significantly younger (27.42 ±5.35 years) than the mild-PE group (29.95 ±4.47 years), (p = 0.01 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.8, 1.2]), and the body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the severe-PE group (29.36 ±1.33 kg/m2) compared to the mild-PE group (27.59 ±1.79 kg/m2), (p = 0.01 [95% CI: –2.37, –1.8, –1.2]) (Table 1).

The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures at delivery were significantly higher in the severe-PE group (176.82 ±2.59, and 116.18 ±2.69 mm Hg, respectively) compared to the mild-PE group (144.55 ±3.34, and 94.64 ±3.42 mm Hg, respectively), (p = 0.03 [95% CI: –33.4, –32.3, –31.1]), and 0.04 [95% CI: –20.7, –19.5, –18.4], respectively) (Table 1).

The serum uric acid and severity of preeclampsia

The serum uric acid was significantly higher in the severe-PE group (7.65 ±0.61 mg/dl) compared to the mild-PE group (5.26 ±0.79 mg/dl), (p = 0.02 [95% CI: –2.7, –2.4, –2.1]) (Table 1).

There were significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic (Fig. 1) and diastolic (Fig. 2) blood pressures [r = 0.27 (p = 0.045) and r = 0.483 (p < 0.001), respectively] in the severe-PE group.

Fig. 1

The relation between serum uric acid and systolic blood pressure in the severe-preeclampsia group

BP – blood pressure, PE – preeclampsia, SUA – serum uric acid

/f/fulltexts/PM/51415/MR-22-51415-g001_min.jpg
Fig. 2

The relation between serum uric acid and diastolic blood pressure in the severe-preeclampsia group

BP – blood pressure, PE – preeclampsia, SUA – serum uric acid

/f/fulltexts/PM/51415/MR-22-51415-g002_min.jpg

There were also significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic (Fig. 3) and dia-stolic (Fig. 4) blood pressures [r = 0.359 (p = 0.007), and r = 0.429 (p = 0.001), respectively] in the mild-PE group.

Fig. 3

The relation between serum uric acid and systolic blood pressure in the mild-preeclampsia group

BP – blood pressure, PE – preeclampsia, SUA – serum uric acid

/f/fulltexts/PM/51415/MR-22-51415-g003_min.jpg
Fig. 4

The relation between serum uric acid and diastolic blood pressure in the mild-preeclampsia group

BP – blood pressure, PE – preeclampsia, SUA – serum uric acid

/f/fulltexts/PM/51415/MR-22-51415-g004_min.jpg

Discussion

Although previous studies found a significant relation between the SUA and severity of PE [9, 10], there are conflicting data regarding this relation, and a systematic review found that the SUA was a poor predictor of maternal and foetal complications in severe PE [11]. Therefore, 110 pregnant women were studied; 55 with mild PE (mild-PE group) were compared to 55 women with severe PE (severe-PE group) in this cross-sectional study to detect the relation between SUA and severity of PE.

Participants’ characteristics

There was no significant difference between the mild-PE group and the severe-PE group regarding the mean parity (p = 0.1), gestational age at delivery (p = 1.0), and the number of women who had a previous history of PE (p = 0.69).

The severe-PE group in this study was significantly younger (27.42 ±5.35 years) than the mild-PE group (29.95 ±4.47 years), (p = 0.01), and the BMI was significantly higher in the severe-PE group (29.36 ±1.33 kg/m2) compared to mild-PE group (27.59 ±1.79 kg/m2), (p = 0.01).

A retrospective multicentre study found that PE women were younger with low parity than those with CH [15].

One hundred and twelve cases of severe PE/eclampsia were studied in a retrospective study, and the majority (41%) of them were primipara [17].

A review article found that young pregnant women with higher BMI are at increased risk of PE/eclampsia than others [18].

The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures at delivery were significantly higher in the studied severe-PE group (176.82 ±2.59 and 116.18 ±2.69 mm Hg, respectively) compared to the mild-PE group (144.55 ±3.34 and 94.64 ±3.42 mm Hg, respectively), (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively).

The ACOG defined mild PE as BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg measured twice (≥ 4 hrs apart) after 20 weeks’ gestation without a previous history of hypertension, and proteinuria (P/C ratio ≥ 0.3) [12].

The ACOG defined severe PE as BP ≥ 160/110 mm Hg after 20 weeks’ gestation without a previous history of hypertension, and proteinuria (P/C ratio ≥ 0.5) [12].

The serum uric acid and severity of preeclampsia

This study found that the SUA was significantly higher in the severe-PE group (7.65 ±0.61 mg/dl) compared to the mild-PE group (5.26 ±0.79 mg/dl), (p = 0.02), and there were significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic [r = 0.27 (p = 0.045)] and diastolic [r = 0.483 (p < 0.001)] blood pressures in the severe-PE group. There were also significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic [r = 0.359 (p = 0.007)] and diastolic [r = 0.429 (p = 0.001)] blood pressures in the mild-PE group.

Serum uric acid is derived from purine oxidation. In pregnancy, the normal SUA ranges between 0.3 and 6 mg/dl, which is less than the non-pregnant level (because of the increased glomerular filtration rate [GFR] during pregnancy) until the 20th week of gestation. In the third trimester the SUA increases gradually and reaches the non-pregnant level [19].

The serum uric acid is elevated in PE due to increased vasoconstrictors (i.e. angiotensin II), which leads to decreased renal blood flow and GFR, with subsequent decreased uric acid clearance [19].

Hyperuricaemia associated with abnormal placentation occurs in severe PE. Nitric oxide (NO) is essential for trophoblast invasion, which is critical for foetal development. The hyperuricaemia diminishes the NO production, with subsequent dysregulation of the trophoblast invasion [19].

Moreover, renal injury occurs in severe PE, associated with decreased GFR and uric acid clearance [19].

Uric acid is a known biomarker for placental ischaemia, renal injury, and oxidative stress, which also occur in severe PE [19].

Kondareddy and Prathap found that the SUA is increased in PE (6.2 ±1.4 mg/dl) compared to normal pregnancy (4.3 ±0.8 mg/dl) [20], and it is a sensitive indicator for PE, with 90% sensitivity and 85% specificity [21].

Nair et al. found a positive correlation between SUA and severity of PE [22]. Roberts et al. found that high SUA was associated with adverse neonatal outcome, including lower birth weight, preterm deliveries, and small-for-gestational-age infants [10].

Moreover, another retrospective study found that elevated SUA in HTN disorders with pregnancy were an important predictor of increased risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes [23].

A comparative study found that SUA had high predictive value to identify PE women at high-risk of IUGR (intrauterine growth retardation) [24]. The elevated SUA in severe PE is mainly due to reduced uric acid clearance, and it is an indication of renal cortical and placental blood flow dysfunction [24].

A recent meta-analysis found that the SUA was elevated in severe PE, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count) and concluded that the SUA can be used for the predication of the severity of PE, and PE-associated complications [25].

The current study was the first study conducted in Maternity Hospital to detect the relation between the SUA and severity of PE. This study found that the SUA was significantly higher in the severe-PE group compared to the mild-PE group. There were significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the severe-PE group. There were also significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the mild-PE group. This study recommends the use of SUA as a reliable marker of the severity of PE.

The failure to detect the relation between SUA and maternal and foetal outcomes (because of the cross- sectional nature of the study and the incomplete delivery and neonatal records) was a limitation of this study. Further studies including the maternal and foetal outcomes are needed to confirm the relation between SUA and adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in PE.

Conclusions

Serum uric acid was significantly higher in the severe-PE group compared to the mild-PE group. There were significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the severe-PE group. There were also significant positive relations between the SUA and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the mild-PE group. This study recommends the use of SUA as a reliable marker of the severity of PE.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: implication for health system strengthening. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 481095.

2 

Ananth CV, Basso O. Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 118-123.

3 

Famurewa AC, Ugwuja EI, Ikaraoha CI. Comparison of serum calcium and magnesium between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant Nigerian women in Abakaliki, Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2016; 6: 33.

4 

Ngwenya S. Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia: incidence, complications, and perinatal outcomes at a low-resource setting, Mpilo Central Hospital, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 353-357.

5 

Abdelazim IA, Amer OO, Shikanova S, Karimova B. Protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hours urine protein in preeclampsia. Ginekol Pol 2022; 93: 9750979.

6 

Shashnak VP, Rashms P. Pregnancy-induced hypertension: current concepts. In: Krishna U, Tank DK, Daftary S, Pvij J (eds). Pregnancy at risk current concepts. 4th ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd., New Delhi 2004.

7 

Kumar N, Singh AK. Maternal serum uric acid as a predictor of severity of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Curr Hypertens Rev 2019; 15: 154-160.

8 

Asgharnia M, Mirblouk F, Kazemi S, et al. Maternal serum uric acid level and maternal and neonatal complications in preeclamptic women: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017; 15: 583-588.

9 

Colmenares-Mejia CC, Quintero-Lesmes DC, Bautista-Niño PK, et al. Uric acid and risk of pre-eclampsia: results from a large case-control study and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 3018.

10 

Roberts JM, Bodnar LM, Lain KY, et al. Uric acid is as important as proteinuria in identifying fetal risk in women with gestational hypertension. Hypertension 2005; 46: 1263-1269.

11 

Thangaratinam S, Ismail KM, Sharp S, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. Tests in prediction of pre-eclampsia severity review group. Accuracy of serum uric acid in predicting complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BJOG 2006; 113: 369-378.

12 

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135: e237-e260.

13 

Hagras AM, Abdelazim IA, Elhamamy N. The accuracy of the calcium-creatinine ratio in a spot urine sample for predicting preeclampsia. Prz Menopauz 2022; 21: 191-196.

14 

Abdelazim IA. Abdelazim equation: for 24-h urine protein from spot urine sample in preeclampsia. J Family Med Prim Care 2021; 10: 1493-1495.

15 

Abdelazim IA, Bekmukhambetov Y, Aringazina R, et al. The outcome of hypertensive disorders with pregnancy. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9: 1678-1683.

16 

Shreya G, Pranathi L, Kavitha V. Comparison of spot urine protein-creatinine ratio with 24-hour urine protein excretion in women with preeclampsia. Int J Integr Med Sci 2015; 2: 55-59.

17 

Ghimire S. Eclampsia: feto-maternal outcomes in a tertiary care centre in eastern Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc 2016; 54: 24-28.

18 

Von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Preventing deaths due to the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 36: 83-102.

19 

Khaliq OP, Konoshita T, Moodley J, Naicker T. The role of uric acid in preeclampsia: is uric acid a causative factor or a sign of preeclampsia? Curr Hypertens Rep 2018; 20: 80.

20 

Kondareddy T, Prathap T. Uric acid as an important biomarker in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contraception Obst Gynecol 2016; 5: 4382-4385.

21 

Jeevitha J. Serum uric acid as a predictor of pre-eclampsia. Univ J Surg Surg Spec 2017; 2.

22 

Nair A, Savitha C. Estimation of serum uric acid as an indicator of severity of preeclampsia and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2017; 67: 109-118.

23 

Hawkins TL, Roberts JM, Mangos GJ, Davis GK, Roberts LM, Brown MA. Plasma uric acid remains a marker of poor outcome in hypertensive pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 484-492.

24 

D’Anna R, Baviera G, Scilipoti A, Leonardi I, Leo R. The clinical utility of serum uric acid measurements in pre-eclampsia and transient hypertension in pregnancy. Panminerva Med 2000; 42: 101-103.

25 

Bellos I, Pergialiotis V, Loutradis D, Daskalakis G. The prognostic role of serum uric acid levels in preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020; 22: 826-834.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.