eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
2/2024
vol. 28
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Performance of ChatGPT in providing patient information about upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Jan Łaszkiewicz
1
,
Wojciech Krajewski
2
,
Wojciech Tomczak
1
,
Joanna Chorbińska
2
,
Łukasz Nowak
2
,
Adam Chełmoński
1
,
Piotr Krajewski
3
,
Aleksandra Sójka
1
,
Bartosz Małkiewicz
2
,
Tomasz Szydełko
2

  1. University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
  2. Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
  3. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 28 (2): 172–181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2024.141567
Online publish date: 2024/07/17
Article file
- Performance of ChatGPT (1).pdf  [0.11 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024.
2. Almås B, Halvorsen OJ, Johannesen TB, Beisland C. Higher than expected and significantly increasing incidence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A population based study. World J Urol 2021; 39: 3385-3391.
3. Grahn A, Coleman JA, Eriksson Y, et al. Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostic and prognostic methods-what’s around the corner? World J Urol 2023; 41: 3405-3411.
4. Krajewski W, Łaszkiewicz J, Nowak Ł, Szydełko T. Current methods facilitating diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive literature review. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33: 230-238.
5. Kowalewska E, Komnacka K, Wójcicki K, Dziewierz A, Dudek D, Tokarek T. Sources of patients’ knowledge about cardiovascular disease prevention in Poland – a pilot study. Post Kardiol Interw 2022; 18: 27-33.
6. Anderson PB, Wanken ZJ, Perri JL, et al. Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71: 497-504.
7. Chen TS, Chen YT, Wang HJ, et al. The prognostic impact of tumor location in pT3N0M0 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 850874.
8. Clusmann J, Kolbinger FR, Muti HS, et al. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Commun Med (Lond) 2023; 3: 141.
9. Ozgor F, Caglar U, Halis A, et al. Urological cancers and ChatGPT: assessing the quality of information and possible risks for patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22: 454-457.
10. Coskun B, Ocakoglu G, Yetemen M, Kaygisiz O. Can ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence language model, provide accurate and high-quality patient information on prostate cancer? Urology 2023; 180: 35-58.
11. Caglar U, Yildiz O, Meric A, et al. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions related to benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75: 729-733.
12. Choi J, Kim JW, Lee YS, et al. Availability of ChatGPT to provide medical information for patients with kidney cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 1542.
13. Caglar U, Yildiz O, Meric A, et al. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions related to pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 2024; 20: 26.e1-26.e5.
14. Cakir H, Caglar U, Yildiz O, Meric A, Ayranci A, Ozgor F. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions related to urolithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56: 17-21.
15. Caglar U, Yildiz O, Ozervarli MF, et al. Assessing the performance of chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) in answering andrology-related questions. Urol Res Pract 2023; 49: 365-369.
16. Johnson SB, King AJ, Warner EL, Aneja S, Kann BH, Bylund CL. Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7: pkad015.
17. Ozgor BY, Simavi MA. Accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT’s free version answers about endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024; 165: 691-695.
18. Deiana G, Dettori M, Arghittu A, Azara A, Gabutti G, Castiglia P. Artificial intelligence and public health: evaluating ChatGPT responses to vaccination myths and misconceptions. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11: 1217.
19. Cao JJ, Kwon DH, Ghaziani TT, et al. Accuracy of information provided by ChatGPT regarding liver cancer surveillance and diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221: 556-559.
20. Ali MJ. ChatGPT and lacrimal drainage disorders: performance and scope of improvement. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 39: 221-225.
21. Tătaru OS, Vartolomei MD, Rassweiler JJ, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer patient management-current trends and future perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 354.
Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
BOOKS
• Genetyka i leczenie chłoniaka rozlanego z dużych komórek B (DLBCL)
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.